Skip to content
DMARC

You're viewing the September 2026 edition (archived). See the latest edition →

social housing landlords · France

50% of social housing landlords in France are not protected against email spoofing

Public DMARC posture of 2 social housing landlords. Edition of September 2026.

0

Protected

1

Enforcing

0

Monitoring only

1

No DMARC

How it has evolved

At-risk over timeShare not protected against spoofing across 5 monthly editions.50%0%50%2026-0650%2026-0750%2026-0850%2026-0950%2026-10
% at risk

Methodology

We read each organization's public DNS — the DMARC record on its consumer-facing domain — and classify the published policy (none / quarantine / reject). "Protected" means a p=reject policy enforced on all mail. A policy published with pct below 100 counts one step lower — only that share of mail receives it — and a domain publishing several DMARC records is classified invalid, since none of them applies. This rule has applied since 7 October 2026; earlier editions classified on p= alone. Only public data is used; figures reflect the edition date and can change as records are updated.

Previous editions

Status by status

All 2 social housing landlords, status by status, in alphabetical order.

The full list of social housing landlords lives in the Rankings, with search, filters and sorting. Open the Rankings →

Enforcing (p=quarantine)1 organisation

Enforcing (p=quarantine): 1 organisation out of 1, in alphabetical order
OrganizationGrade
Troyes Aube Habitattroyes-aube-habitat.frB

No DMARC1 organisation

No DMARC: 1 organisation out of 1, in alphabetical order
OrganizationGrade
Habitat en Régionhabitat-en-region.frF