social housing landlords · France
50% of social housing landlords in France are not protected against email spoofing
Public DMARC posture of 2 social housing landlords. Edition of October 2026.
0
Protected
1
Enforcing
0
Monitoring only
1
No DMARC
How it has evolved
Methodology
We read each organization's public DNS — the DMARC record on its consumer-facing domain — and classify the published policy (none / quarantine / reject). "Protected" means a p=reject policy enforced on all mail. A policy published with pct below 100 counts one step lower — only that share of mail receives it — and a domain publishing several DMARC records is classified invalid, since none of them applies. This rule has applied since 7 October 2026; earlier editions classified on p= alone. Only public data is used; figures reflect the edition date and can change as records are updated.
Previous editions
Status by status
All 2 social housing landlords, status by status, in alphabetical order.
The full list of social housing landlords lives in the Rankings, with search, filters and sorting. Open the Rankings →
Enforcing (p=quarantine)1 organisation
| Organization | Grade |
|---|---|
| Troyes Aube Habitattroyes-aube-habitat.fr | B |
No DMARC1 organisation
| Organization | Grade |
|---|---|
| Habitat en Régionhabitat-en-region.fr | F |