Skip to content
DMARC

You're viewing the September 2026 edition (archived). See the latest edition →

higher education institutions · France

75% of higher education institutions in France are not protected against email spoofing

Public DMARC posture of 4 higher education institutions. Edition of September 2026.

0

Protected

1

Enforcing

3

Monitoring only

0

No DMARC

How it has evolved

At-risk over timeShare not protected against spoofing across 5 monthly editions.75%0%75%2026-0675%2026-0775%2026-0875%2026-0975%2026-10
% at risk

Methodology

We read each organization's public DNS — the DMARC record on its consumer-facing domain — and classify the published policy (none / quarantine / reject). "Protected" means a p=reject policy enforced on all mail. A policy published with pct below 100 counts one step lower — only that share of mail receives it — and a domain publishing several DMARC records is classified invalid, since none of them applies. This rule has applied since 7 October 2026; earlier editions classified on p= alone. Only public data is used; figures reflect the edition date and can change as records are updated.

Previous editions

Status by status

All 4 higher education institutions, status by status, in alphabetical order.

The full list of higher education institutions lives in the Rankings, with search, filters and sorting. Open the Rankings →

Enforcing (p=quarantine)1 organisation

Enforcing (p=quarantine): 1 organisation out of 1, in alphabetical order
OrganizationGrade
Université Polytechnique Hauts-de-Franceuphf.frB

Monitoring only (p=none)3 organisations

Monitoring only (p=none): 3 organisations out of 3, in alphabetical order
OrganizationGrade
INP Toulouseinp-toulouse.frF
Institut Polytechnique de Bordeauxipb.frD
Institut Polytechnique de Parisip-paris.frF