Medido el 2026-07-12 · DNS público
¿Está touraine.fr protegido contra la suplantación de correo?
No — touraine.fr no tiene política DMARC y puede ser suplantado.
Postura sin cambios desde el 2026-06-19
Más protegido que el 0 % de departamentos en Francia
El 16 % del sector ya aplica p=reject
F
DMARC
ausente
SPF
-all
DKIM
ninguno encontrado
Cómo corregirlo
Thomas, tu CISO virtual con IA, identifica cada fuente, escribe el DNS exacto y lleva tu dominio de p=none a p=reject con total seguridad.
Qué significa esto
- • Aucun enregistrement DMARC publié (_dmarc.<domaine>). Les destinataires n'ont aucune politique à appliquer.
- • Aucune clé DKIM trouvée sur les sélecteurs courants (le domaine peut utiliser des sélecteurs non standards).
Historial
- 2026-06-26Primera mediciónSin DMARC
Sobre Indre-et-Loire (37)
The Indre-et-Loire departmental council, a French local authority based in the Centre-Val de Loire region, manages an extensive scope of public services encompassing education, social welfare, infrastructure, and economic development. Its touraine.fr domain serves as the primary digital communication channel with citizens, institutional partners, and service providers. This domain routinely delivers official correspondence, administrative notifications, social services decisions, and emergency communications reaching thousands of external recipients. Email authentication holds strategic importance for this organization: risks of touraine.fr impersonation could undermine public trust, enable phishing attacks targeting users, or compromise administrative processes. As a French public entity, the department must anticipate reinforced security requirements, particularly those emerging from NIS2 and DORA directives, which mandate enhanced cyber resilience standards and digital risk governance frameworks. Robust DMARC implementation on touraine.fr, complemented by SPF and DKIM, provides a foundation for this regulatory compliance. It also safeguards domain reputation against spam campaigns and phishing attacks exploiting institutional identity. For a local authority of this scale, securing outbound email flows and monitoring impersonation attempts represents a critical issue for service continuity and administrative legitimacy.
